The Treatment Gap in Osteoporosis: Fewer Than 20% of High-Risk Patients Receive Care
A comprehensive review documents the growing osteoporosis treatment gap — with diagnosis rates below 20% and post-fracture treatment rates declining despite effective therapies being available.
Read the original article at Journal of Clinical MedicineKairos™'s Take
Kairos™'s perspective on this story
A 2021 review published in the Journal of Clinical Medicine examined one of the most paradoxical problems in modern medicine: effective osteoporosis treatments exist, but the vast majority of patients who need them never receive them. The numbers are difficult to reconcile. Of the estimated 200 million women worldwide with osteoporosis, fewer than 20% receive a diagnosis. Of those diagnosed, fewer than 35% receive treatment — even after sustaining a fragility fracture. And of those who start treatment, fewer than half continue beyond six months. The treatment gap has actually widened over the past decade, increasing from 55% in 2010 to over 70% by 2019 in European data.
The GLOW study, involving over 60,000 older women across 10 countries, demonstrated that more than 80% of women with a fragility fracture did not receive osteoporosis treatment in the year following the fracture. This is the equivalent of diagnosing diabetes and then not prescribing insulin — the condition is known, the intervention is proven, and nobody acts.
Why This Matters for Midlife Health
The treatment gap is not primarily a knowledge problem — it is a system problem. Primary care visits are short. Osteoporosis has no symptoms until a fracture happens. Screening is not always prioritized. And patients often do not know they should be asking about bone health during their 50s. The result is that millions of people at risk go unidentified, and millions who are identified go untreated. For individuals in midlife, the takeaway is clear: the system may not catch this for you. You need to be an active participant in your own bone health assessment.
The Tracking Connection
Kairos™ exists in part because of gaps like this one. When a patient walks into an appointment with a documented history — symptoms tracked over months, risk factors cataloged, previous DXA results organized, family history recorded — the provider has no choice but to engage with the data. Tracking does not replace clinical judgment, but it eliminates the most common reason bone health gets overlooked: it never comes up. Making it come up is the first step toward closing the treatment gap, one patient at a time.
Ready to start tracking?
Kairos™ tracks, scores, and interprets the symptoms of midlife hormonal change — for both women and men.
Get StartedMore from the newsroom
SWAN Study: Bone Loss Accelerates Sharply During the Menopause Transition
The landmark SWAN longitudinal study showed that bone mineral density remains stable in early perimenopause but declines sharply in late perimenopause — about 2% per year — continuing into early postmenopause.
The FREEDOM Trial: Denosumab Reduces Vertebral Fractures by 68% in Postmenopausal Women
The landmark FREEDOM trial published in NEJM showed that denosumab, a monoclonal antibody, significantly reduced vertebral, hip, and nonvertebral fractures in women with osteoporosis over 3 years.
USPSTF Updates Osteoporosis Screening Recommendations: What Changed in 2025
The U.S. Preventive Services Task Force reaffirmed screening for women 65+ and expanded guidance on risk assessment for younger postmenopausal women.